<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for R. J. Grigaitis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.grigaitis.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.grigaitis.net</link>
	<description>RJ's thoughts, comments, and website updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:17:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Hamas Plays Host to Pedophilia by Aorati Melani</title>
		<link>http://blog.grigaitis.net/2009/09/hamas-plays-host-to-pedophilia/comment-page-1/#comment-5126</link>
		<dc:creator>Aorati Melani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grigaitis.net/?p=584#comment-5126</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. Thanks for taking the trouble to clarify this.

I received the same email yesterday, and just like you I started looking for sources to confirm or defy it. However, I cannot say I am convinced yet one way or the other. 

I have a question, I wonder if you could help me on this. As you say, in the article about last year&#039;s wedding, it says the event took place AFTER the weddings. Why then could the brides not be with the grooms? As far as I know, the bride and groom are separate until the ceremony, but after they sign the marriage contract, they can see each other, and they usually are together during the celebration that takes place afterward.

Also, it does seem rather strange that the girls in the video should be dressed like western brides. On the other hand, the grooms also have western type clothes. As you pointed out, it would be rather unusual to have muslim brides dressed western style - but it is equally unsusual to have muslim bridesmaids dressed like that, is it not? I am not even sure it is the custom to have bridesmaids in muslim weddings, it is the first time I saw something like this.

Forgive my doubt, I have no intention of slandering muslims, I do not take anybody&#039;s part, I am just trying to seek out the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. Thanks for taking the trouble to clarify this.</p>
<p>I received the same email yesterday, and just like you I started looking for sources to confirm or defy it. However, I cannot say I am convinced yet one way or the other. </p>
<p>I have a question, I wonder if you could help me on this. As you say, in the article about last year&#8217;s wedding, it says the event took place AFTER the weddings. Why then could the brides not be with the grooms? As far as I know, the bride and groom are separate until the ceremony, but after they sign the marriage contract, they can see each other, and they usually are together during the celebration that takes place afterward.</p>
<p>Also, it does seem rather strange that the girls in the video should be dressed like western brides. On the other hand, the grooms also have western type clothes. As you pointed out, it would be rather unusual to have muslim brides dressed western style &#8211; but it is equally unsusual to have muslim bridesmaids dressed like that, is it not? I am not even sure it is the custom to have bridesmaids in muslim weddings, it is the first time I saw something like this.</p>
<p>Forgive my doubt, I have no intention of slandering muslims, I do not take anybody&#8217;s part, I am just trying to seek out the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fr. Richard Rohr O.F.M. by George</title>
		<link>http://blog.grigaitis.net/2009/02/fr-richard-rohr-ofm/comment-page-1/#comment-4506</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grigaitis.net/?p=180#comment-4506</guid>
		<description>Born and raised Catholic, I now consider myself a Christian first and put my denomination as secondary.  A member of my family was reading The Naked Now, so I picked it up and scaned it. I find it hard to believe that the author is a Franciscan priest.  I think his chapter titled &quot;Faith is more how to believe than what to believe&quot; says it all.  He talks more about religion rather than Christianity, he seems to be saying that all religions lead to the same place.  He takes the simple &quot;Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is Lord&quot; and give a new age slant to scripture along with his mystical eye concept, very dangerous indeed.  I would not recommend his book to anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Born and raised Catholic, I now consider myself a Christian first and put my denomination as secondary.  A member of my family was reading The Naked Now, so I picked it up and scaned it. I find it hard to believe that the author is a Franciscan priest.  I think his chapter titled &#8220;Faith is more how to believe than what to believe&#8221; says it all.  He talks more about religion rather than Christianity, he seems to be saying that all religions lead to the same place.  He takes the simple &#8220;Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is Lord&#8221; and give a new age slant to scripture along with his mystical eye concept, very dangerous indeed.  I would not recommend his book to anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mandatory Celibacy Caused the Clergy Sex Abuse Scandal by A Sinner</title>
		<link>http://blog.grigaitis.net/2009/04/mandatory-celibacy-caused-the-clergy-sex-abuse-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-4339</link>
		<dc:creator>A Sinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grigaitis.net/?p=260#comment-4339</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many have the idea that if priests were allowed to get married, they wouldn’t have to suppress their sexual desires, and therefore would not fall into immoral sexual relationships. Anyone that holds such ideas is actually ignorant of the meaning of marriage, as they are of the meaning of  celibacy.&quot;

I would agree with this, but it&#039;s a straw man. While some people have a naive idea that married priests would solve the problem because priests wouldn&#039;t be repressed, the more nuanced of us obviously do not believe such a thing.

However, that doesn&#039;t mean the institutional dynamics of mandatory celibacy didn&#039;t cause the cover-ups, etc.

Whenever the concepts of sex and obedience are used in the same sentence...you are going to have problems.

Combine that with a homosocial Old Boys Club authority structure, and you&#039;ve got the perfect storm.

It&#039;s the same reason there are problems with rape in prison, with hazing in frat houses, with sexual harassment in the military. These problems ARE sociologically STRUCTURAL.

And at the heart of it, in the Catholic clergy, is a bizarre link forged long ago between SEX and POWER. Of which &quot;mandatory&quot; celibacy is only one manifestation.

It is naive to blame celibacy in itself, as if simply being single and chaste makes one molest children. But the institutional dynamics involved with this idea that it is &quot;mandatory&quot;...are a different beast entirely, and at the heart of the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many have the idea that if priests were allowed to get married, they wouldn’t have to suppress their sexual desires, and therefore would not fall into immoral sexual relationships. Anyone that holds such ideas is actually ignorant of the meaning of marriage, as they are of the meaning of  celibacy.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would agree with this, but it&#8217;s a straw man. While some people have a naive idea that married priests would solve the problem because priests wouldn&#8217;t be repressed, the more nuanced of us obviously do not believe such a thing.</p>
<p>However, that doesn&#8217;t mean the institutional dynamics of mandatory celibacy didn&#8217;t cause the cover-ups, etc.</p>
<p>Whenever the concepts of sex and obedience are used in the same sentence&#8230;you are going to have problems.</p>
<p>Combine that with a homosocial Old Boys Club authority structure, and you&#8217;ve got the perfect storm.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same reason there are problems with rape in prison, with hazing in frat houses, with sexual harassment in the military. These problems ARE sociologically STRUCTURAL.</p>
<p>And at the heart of it, in the Catholic clergy, is a bizarre link forged long ago between SEX and POWER. Of which &#8220;mandatory&#8221; celibacy is only one manifestation.</p>
<p>It is naive to blame celibacy in itself, as if simply being single and chaste makes one molest children. But the institutional dynamics involved with this idea that it is &#8220;mandatory&#8221;&#8230;are a different beast entirely, and at the heart of the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not Really Pro-Choice by Chris C</title>
		<link>http://blog.grigaitis.net/2010/01/not-really-pro-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-4014</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grigaitis.net/?p=883#comment-4014</guid>
		<description>I totally agree. It is very frustrating to read any reports in the media that refuse to refer to the name Pro-Life and instead consistently use ant-abortion as the term. I have read that this is one of the protocols mandated by various news organizations when editing reports for print. In that light I would never want to give the choice crowd the excuse to point a finger and talk about what an ignorant uneducated boob I must be for doing that to them. However I personally am not ashamed to be called anti-abortion. I just find that pigeon holes the whole movement and ignores the vast majority of what it means to be pro-life. I expect that most pro-choicer&#039;s would not feel so proud to be called pro-abortion or anti-life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. It is very frustrating to read any reports in the media that refuse to refer to the name Pro-Life and instead consistently use ant-abortion as the term. I have read that this is one of the protocols mandated by various news organizations when editing reports for print. In that light I would never want to give the choice crowd the excuse to point a finger and talk about what an ignorant uneducated boob I must be for doing that to them. However I personally am not ashamed to be called anti-abortion. I just find that pigeon holes the whole movement and ignores the vast majority of what it means to be pro-life. I expect that most pro-choicer&#8217;s would not feel so proud to be called pro-abortion or anti-life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hamas Plays Host to Pedophilia by Makeup DIY</title>
		<link>http://blog.grigaitis.net/2009/09/hamas-plays-host-to-pedophilia/comment-page-1/#comment-3886</link>
		<dc:creator>Makeup DIY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grigaitis.net/?p=584#comment-3886</guid>
		<description>Hello darling, sweet blog! I genuinely treasure this article.. I was wondering about this for a while now. This cleared a lot up for me! Do you have a rss feed that I can add?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello darling, sweet blog! I genuinely treasure this article.. I was wondering about this for a while now. This cleared a lot up for me! Do you have a rss feed that I can add?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Magic Mouse by rj</title>
		<link>http://blog.grigaitis.net/2009/10/magic-mouse/comment-page-1/#comment-3857</link>
		<dc:creator>rj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grigaitis.net/?p=708#comment-3857</guid>
		<description>I also have a 24 inch iMac (2008), and the only thing I&#039;ve done is disable all wireless stuff, such as Bluetooth and AirPort. I also don&#039;t use a wireless router, but plug in with ethernet cables. Since I have a 2008 iMac, I ordered it with a Mighty Mouse and keyboard that have cables. I&#039;d like to try the Magic Mouse, but since it&#039;s wireless, I&#039;ll wait.

I don&#039;t have a dirty electricity filter, but I do shut down every night and unplug from the wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also have a 24 inch iMac (2008), and the only thing I&#8217;ve done is disable all wireless stuff, such as Bluetooth and AirPort. I also don&#8217;t use a wireless router, but plug in with ethernet cables. Since I have a 2008 iMac, I ordered it with a Mighty Mouse and keyboard that have cables. I&#8217;d like to try the Magic Mouse, but since it&#8217;s wireless, I&#8217;ll wait.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a dirty electricity filter, but I do shut down every night and unplug from the wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Magic Mouse by michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.grigaitis.net/2009/10/magic-mouse/comment-page-1/#comment-3851</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grigaitis.net/?p=708#comment-3851</guid>
		<description>Could you please email me and share how I could protect myself from my 24 inch imac (2009)? Thanks very much for the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you please email me and share how I could protect myself from my 24 inch imac (2009)? Thanks very much for the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protest the Blasphemous Calendar in Spain by Betty Lajoie</title>
		<link>http://blog.grigaitis.net/2009/10/protest-the-blasphemous-calendar-in-spain/comment-page-1/#comment-3828</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty Lajoie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grigaitis.net/?p=722#comment-3828</guid>
		<description>First-rate writing. You have got a new fan. Please maintain the fabulous writings and I look forward to more of your intriguing writings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First-rate writing. You have got a new fan. Please maintain the fabulous writings and I look forward to more of your intriguing writings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dr. Williams&#8217; Dishonest Scholarship by Nafeedah</title>
		<link>http://blog.grigaitis.net/2009/09/dr-williams-dishonest-scholarship/comment-page-1/#comment-3629</link>
		<dc:creator>Nafeedah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grigaitis.net/?p=607#comment-3629</guid>
		<description>I am a muslim girl who came across the 450 weddings celebrated by the hamas from a forwarded mail.  I knew it could not be true but I was desperate: the odds seemed against my conviction..the videos were there.  Then, i started reading on google all the material i found and eventually i came upon this blog... Thank you very much for definitely setting my mind to rest... There is a lot of hate-news on Islam on the Internet, I never realised this till today...Reading this  blog has reminded me that what Islam says and what Islam has been made to say are two vastly different things.  
Thank you for sharing your knowledge..thank you for helping others to think...
May God Bless You....
Nafeedah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a muslim girl who came across the 450 weddings celebrated by the hamas from a forwarded mail.  I knew it could not be true but I was desperate: the odds seemed against my conviction..the videos were there.  Then, i started reading on google all the material i found and eventually i came upon this blog&#8230; Thank you very much for definitely setting my mind to rest&#8230; There is a lot of hate-news on Islam on the Internet, I never realised this till today&#8230;Reading this  blog has reminded me that what Islam says and what Islam has been made to say are two vastly different things.<br />
Thank you for sharing your knowledge..thank you for helping others to think&#8230;<br />
May God Bless You&#8230;.<br />
Nafeedah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Married Clergy? by R. J. Grigaitis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Vow of Celibacy</title>
		<link>http://blog.grigaitis.net/2009/04/married-clergy/comment-page-1/#comment-3368</link>
		<dc:creator>R. J. Grigaitis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Vow of Celibacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grigaitis.net/?p=251#comment-3368</guid>
		<description>[...] The first mistake these men make is that they never left or gave up the priesthood. The Sacrament of Holy Orders, like Baptism and Confirmation, is unrepeatable and permanent. What they did leave or give up was their vow of celibacy. Being released from this vow came with the serious consequence of not being allowed to normally exercise their priesthood. I&#8217;ve explained this in a previous post (http://blog.grigaitis.net/2009/04/married-clergy/). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The first mistake these men make is that they never left or gave up the priesthood. The Sacrament of Holy Orders, like Baptism and Confirmation, is unrepeatable and permanent. What they did leave or give up was their vow of celibacy. Being released from this vow came with the serious consequence of not being allowed to normally exercise their priesthood. I&#8217;ve explained this in a previous post (<a href="http://blog.grigaitis.net/2009/04/married-clergy/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.grigaitis.net/2009/04/married-clergy/</a>). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
